Gun Policy
The Second Amendment is a single sentence that has produced two centuries of argument. The modern debate is about how to balance a constitutional right to bear arms against the toll of gun violence in American life.
Historical Background
The Second Amendment was ratified in 1791, written against the memory of British attempts to disarm colonial militias. For most of American history, federal gun regulation was sparse. The National Firearms Act of 1934, passed in response to gangland violence, taxed and registered machine guns and short-barreled weapons. The Gun Control Act of 1968, passed after the assassinations of that decade, established licensed dealers and prohibited categories. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 required background checks for purchases from licensed dealers. The federal assault weapons ban of 1994 expired in 2004. The Supreme Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller affirmed an individual right to keep arms for self-defense in the home. Mass shootings have driven repeated waves of legislative debate, but federal law has shifted little in recent decades.
The Conservative Argument
Conservatives argue that the right to keep and bear arms is a foundational American liberty, written into the Bill of Rights precisely because the founders understood that an armed citizenry is the final check on tyranny. Self-defense is a natural right, and the law should not leave law-abiding citizens helpless. Gun control laws, in this view, are routinely ignored by criminals and end up disarming only the responsible. The real drivers of violence are family breakdown, mental illness, and the failures of the criminal justice system. Hardening targets like schools, enforcing existing laws against violent offenders, and supporting concealed carry by trained citizens save lives. The Second Amendment, conservatives argue, is not a sporting clause. It is a guarantee of liberty.
The Progressive Argument
Progressives argue that the United States stands alone among developed nations in the scale of its gun deaths, and the difference is the number and accessibility of firearms. Universal background checks, red-flag laws, restrictions on high-capacity magazines, and bans on certain military-style rifles would reduce mass shootings and everyday violence. The Second Amendment, in this view, was written in the era of the musket and was understood for most of American history to permit substantial regulation. Sensible limits are not confiscation. Most gun owners support background checks. The status quo, progressives argue, costs tens of thousands of American lives every year, and no other right is treated as absolute in the face of that toll.
Key Legislation and Turning Points
- •The National Firearms Act (1934) regulated machine guns and silencers.
- •The Gun Control Act (1968) established licensed dealers and prohibited categories of buyers.
- •The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (1993) required federal background checks.
- •The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (1994) included a ten-year ban on certain semi-automatic rifles, which expired in 2004.
- •District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) recognized an individual right to bear arms for self-defense.
- •New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) struck down restrictive concealed-carry permit regimes.
Why It Matters
Few debates touch the deep structure of American life more directly. Firearms are present in roughly four in ten households. Gun deaths claim tens of thousands of Americans every year through homicide, suicide, and accident. The question of how to honor a constitutional right while addressing real loss is one the country has wrestled with for generations. It will not be settled soon, but it must be argued honestly.